India's Semiconductor Surge: Technological Geopolitics in Asia-Pacific

 

Technological Singularity: AI and Post-Human Era

 

AI Era: Geopolitics of AI Semiconductors

 

Science Advice - Way Forward for SIFC

 

Can Science Advice Strength Pakistan’s Democracy?

 

New World Order: China's Leadership in the Global South

 

Can SciDip Bridge the Divide Between Pakistan and India?

 

Asian Century: Re-engineering SAARC Via Science Diplomacy

 

Shouldn't Pakistan Focus on AI-powered SMART Governance?

 

Health Corruption – Isn’t it talking point for the global health security during CoVID-19?

Infectious Diseases and National Security: Who will frame NHSP of Pakistan?

Health Intelligence: Missing Dimension in the Security of Pakistan

National Health Security: Look Forward Call To National Security Council...

Technopolitika: The Politics of Global Health Security

Science for Society: Linking Science to CPEC

World Science Day for Peace and Development (WSDPD) has been celebrated every year, when United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) declared 10^th November as the day dedicated to science. This day is celebrated so as to emphasize the importance that science has in modern-day society and to heave understanding of the function that science has in the promotion of peace and sustainable development. The core motive of the Science Day is the promotion and understanding of science among the society and general public to make them realized why science is relevant to their daily lives and to engage them in debate on science related issues.

The global nature of science, the speed with which it is developing and spreading, and the extent it is critical to national priorities are leading more countries to look at the techno-economic mechanism of their science strategies. Science exchanges are an essential platform for countries looking to create better connections with the public of other nations, and to establish and strengthen relationships. With multiple socio-economic challenges faced by the world today, scientific interactions are valuable platforms for states and scientists to cooperate and share knowledge, expertise and resources. In turn, this can promote techno-economic and social progress, and contribute to peace and sustainable development. Science can not only enable countries to overcome a negative image in parts of the world but also, take place in the long-established sense of the word, where delegations travel to each other’s countries to share ideas on science, innovation and technology.

Historically, integration between regions has been a key element in enhancing scientific activities and the cooperation long been facilitated by the diverse means of research and development (R&D). In the South Asia, there is exceptional Chinese cooperation with Pakistan for the 21^st Century Silk Road – the global Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). China and Pakistan as all weather strategic partners and glorious friends always try to make strong relations through different geo-politics and strategic agreements. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is one of the imperative strategic partnerships to make stronger relations of both countries. Similarly, China has several science exchanges with Pakistan, with the key role in setting the stage for R&D, institutions and businesses to collaborate with each other. In the future scenario, the strategic scientific partnership through CPEC may not only develop Pakistan’s science infrastructure and research capabilities, but also techno-economic development of both the countries. By creating science knowledge and understanding through science may outfit both countries to find solutions to today’s techno-economic challenges and to achieve sustainable development and greater societies. Linking science to CPEC, public understanding of science and the participation of citizen of the both countries in science should be a considerable factor for sustainable and peaceful development of CPEC. The CPEC could then not only serve as a game changer for China and Pakistan, but also the entire region.

Do The Pakistan Government’s Technology Transfer Strategy Even Work With Science Diplomacy?

Why have technology transfer strategies not been successful in Pakistan? Are we moving globally intended to technology transfer for nothing? Conceptually, the relation between technology transfer and foreign policy is rather an old phenomenon. Throughout the world history, they mutually influenced and had an impact on each other. Scientific age is said to have begun in seventeenth century. Later, technological development went alongside the economic growth. By the end of nineteenth century, role of science had become related to applications more closely as industrial research. In the twentieth century, industrial research became a self-sustaining system and vital factor in the amplification of technological innovation. When we come to the post-Cold War ear and the twenty-first century, new challenges have become more prominent, such as environmental security and climate change, health and biosafety, biotechnology and biomedicine, cyber security and bioterrorism, food safety and genetically modified crops, nuclear proliferation and civil use of nuclear power, weapons of mass destruction, energy and water supplies, humanitarian crises etc. In today’s world, many of the global challenges have a scientific aspect and no one single nation is capable of tackling these challenges alone. These new global challenges required new techniques for international cooperation, technology transfer and diplomacy. In other words, “global problems require global solutions”.

In this context, Science Diplomacy – hereafter SciDip, as a concept and a non-traditional method of diplomacy and international relations had gained importance. In reality, it is not new, but as a concept it is quite contemporary. As can be exemplified through different country examples, the British Royal Society, which was established in the eighteenth century, has always used science as a tool to solve military and political problems. The concept gained importance, especially after the World War II, but even before the United Kingdom (UK) appointed its first accredited scientific representative to Washington in 1941. Then another British representative was sent to China between the years 1942-1946. NATO set up a science program in 1957 and US National Academy of Science (NAS) ran parallel Committees on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC) together with the Soviet Union Academy of Sciences (ASUSSR). After the end of the Cold War, the activities of SciDip gained a momentum is the countries like UK, USA and Japan etc. In the US, the post of Science and Technology Adviser to the US Secretary of State was established. In terms of the UK, their government established the Science and Innovation Network (SIN). This network is comprised of more than ninety staff working in forty cities in twenty-five countries and their main aim is to promote the scientific expertise of UK abroad and to build international collaborations in the area of S&T. Japan is another active country in this respect and has a formal SciDip policy since 2007 with the aim of increasing participation of Japanese scientists into international research programs, providing international scientific advice, and building scientific capacity.

In our globally-interconnected society where urgencies of the present and future meet today – S&T advice in foreign ministry is part of the solution to address the issues, impacts and resources within, across and beyond the boundary of state. Today, we are witnessing a growing presence of S&T in the whole UN system and the 2030 Agenda decisively admit not only the critical role of S&T but also formalizes its alliance through the establishment of initiatives such as the Technology Facilitation Mechanism (TFM). Correspondingly, technology transfer is an important issue and key component of economic and social development of Pakistan. The successful implementation of technology transfer depends not only on good technical specification but also, on the right social, political and institutional environment. The existing capacity of institutes in Pakistan is not sufficient and the situation demands that the Government of Pakistan (GoP) must establish merit-based institutions, with proper technical manpower to deal with the problems relevant to technology transfer and technological development. As said by Lewis M. Branscomb, “Unless scientist and policymakers learn to work together effectively, both domains will suffer”. In Pakistan, there is escalating obligation on policymakers for science advice to transfer of technology because scientific evidence may help to manage risks and facilitate them to formulate better and effective regulatory and legislative decision. In this regards, the GoP may perform the following roles:

·         Device the SciDip based foreign policy and integrates a science perspective into traditional foreign policy and creates an information platform for SciDip.

·         Establish the coordinating office for SciDip to highlight the connection between science, social and economic development.

·         Establish effective mechanisms for ensuring appropriate and timely scientific advice and define clear and transparent framework and rule of procedure for advisory process and mechanism.

·         Implement measure that build societal trust in science for policymaking and work with international organizations to ensure coherence between national and international scientific advisory mechanism related to complex global challenges.

·         Utilize science and technology personnel in diplomatic activities/missions and promote strategic joint research development with regional countries with high diplomatic importance.

·         Continue its efforts to strengthen good governance, with the emphasis on merit-based institutional development and rule of law. And, exceptionally eliminate corruption and nepotism from the society.

Pak-Sino Health Tourism: A Win-Win Model For CPEC

“If the “Belt and Road” are likened to the two wings of a soaring Asia, then connectivity is like arteries and veins.” – Xi Jinping

China’s ambitious plan to stabilize its western periphery through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has at its core the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). China’s progress-solidity nexus epitomizes one of the main drivers behind CPEC. CPEC is a framework of geographical connectivity linked through the BRI, which is not for the benefit of China and Pakistan but for all the countries involved in the initiative and anticipated to provide regional development, economic growth and peace through win-win model. Moreover, the project is expected to create at least 700,000 direct jobs and serve as a springboard for the development of industries such as retail, education, health and tourism etc.By the start of this century, world is rapidly progressing toward globalization. The globalization of healthcare has also given rise to an innovative trend called “Health Tourism”. It’s also called “Healthcare Globalization” or “Health Vacation”. Whatever you name it, health tourism is mounting and diversifying on a global level and the global health tourism market was valued at $15.5 billion in 2017, and is estimated to reach at $28.8 billion by 2024 and Asian health tourism market is anticipated to cross $14 billion mark by 2022. Health tourism is a swiftly evolving trend and the fastest growing sector not only, in developed nations but also, in developing nations. Health tourism is becoming a worldwide, multi billion-dollar industry and recent trend illustrate that people from developed countries are traveling to developing countries for affordable healthcare.In the last decade, the perception of well being has gone further than ever before,thus, health tourism has emerged as an industry, where people travel often long distances to overseas countries to obtain medical, dental and surgical care while at the same time being holidaymakers. The phenomenon has developed significantly in recent years mainly due to the high cost of treatment and long waiting list in developed countries.

Health tourism has grown in a number of nation-states especially in Asian states. The chief regions in Asia are Thailand, India, Malaysia, Singapore and South Korea. Thailand accounts for maximum share of the Asian health tourism market, being followed by India and Singapore.Likewise, based on the Sixth Economic Development Plan (2017-2022), Iran is projected to attract 600,000 health tourist every year with ultimate goal to earn $25 billion a year through tourism by 2025, around $2.5 billion of which will come from health tourism. Health tourism has also boomed on the Chinese mainland over the past few years and China is fast emerging as a desirable destination for seeking medical care. American, European and Canadian patients favor India, Thailand and Malaysia.Thailand became famous as destination for health tourism as early as the 1970s because it specialized in sex change operations, and later moved into cosmetic surgery. Currently, Thailand is home to an ever-increasing number of cosmetic surgery and related services providers including liposuction, face lifts and anti-ageing treatments. In India, heart-related diseases and organ transplantation are being treated at outstanding facilities at rates that are competitive globally. In all these cases, the low cost of quality healthcare services is a major driving force behind the rising trend of health tourism to these destinations.Malaysia became involved in health tourism industry after 1998 and now emerging as a major destination for those seeking knee cap replacement, spinal fusion and other joint-related surgeries and medical procedures.Dubai also has built Healthcare City (DHCC) to capture the Middle Eastern market and divert it from Asia. The DHCC, “the world’s first healthcare free zone” strategically located between Asia and Europe is a highly regulated institution that aims to provide high-quality healthcare, medical education and research in region.

Health tourism is probable to increase even faster in the future and the number of countries seeking to develop health tourism industry as it is an emerging global industry. CPEC could play a key role in mutual cooperation between Chinese and Pakistani health tourism industries.  If health tourism model comes to fulfillment, the multi-billion dollar industry may drive even greater change to both states.Pakistan has a huge potential to become a regional health tourism hub like other neighboring countries as Pakistan is rich in doctors and technical staff of international reputation in their respective fields.In near future Pakistan may have potential to develop health tourism if the coordination between Ministry of National Health Services & Regulations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Tourism/Pakistan Tourism Development Corporation (PTDC) be established.It is also fact, health infrastructure in Pakistan is much below expectations and international standers due to poor health governance, lack of health financing, lack of centralized health policy and corruption in health sector.In this regard, the Government of Pakistan and policy makers may instantaneously act on the following recommendations:

• Devise the health tourism based health policy and clear position to health tourism as the new axis. Produce policy papers on subjects arising in health tourism.
• Integrate a health perspective into tourism policy and create an information platform for health tourism.
• Establish the coordinating office for health tourism to highlight the connection between health, social and economic development.
• Start a health tourist visa category and reduce the brain drain phenomenon within the country.
• Continue its efforts to strengthen good governance including health governance, with emphasis on merit based institutional development and the rule of law. And, exceptionally eliminate corruption and nepotism from the society.

Science In Diplomacy: A New Dimension For Foreign Policy Of Pakistan

“The soft power of science has the potential to reshape global diplomacy” – Ahmed Zewail

In a swiftly changing world where new global challenges influence every country, science is not only one of the vibrant forces in socioeconomic progress but also, promoting globalization roles that will exaggerate in the future. Science is considered as a neutral area and has no nationality. In this respect, it is comparatively easier to build up international cooperation through science rather than political or military relations. Moreover, science can play a bridging role between the nations through their scientists which have fragile political relations. It means the deployment of science as a tool of diplomacy – Science in Diplomacy, for the sake of developing better relations among nations.

Science Diplomacy (SciDip) is a reflection of the significance that each country and government grants to science and technology (S&T) in designing and implementing its foreign policy. Up till now, the most developed countries have adopted actions aimed at raising the profile of S&T in decision-making on international affairs, strengthening their S&T activities in foreign policy. The USA, United Kingdom, Japan and New Zealand have created the position of Scientific Advisor in their respective Foreign Ministries; the United Kingdom and Switzerland have integrated their Scientific Councils into their Industrial Councils to better recruit world-class scientists and carry out collaborations, whilst promoting the internationalization of innovation. International scientific and technological cooperation has also become a leading aspect of US foreign policy. The Department of State (DoS) has a Science and Technology Adviser to the Secretary of State, making the USA one of few countries in the world with such a government position. The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in coordination with the DoS, runs an ambitious grant program for training scientists in the areas of S&T policy within the US government. The DoS scientific diplomacy strategy focuses on promoting overall participation in areas that involve S&T.

Regarding SciDip, the Japanese government established its main policy lines in a document by a group of experts in the field and that document specifically establishes 15 lines of action for utilization of science in diplomacy. For at least the last decade, Germany invests a great deal of effort in international cooperation in the field of education and science through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The German Ministry of Education and Science has its own office for the internationalization of science that receives expert advice. For instance, Germany has been building “Science Houses” in other countries, devoted exclusively to disseminating German technology, innovation and science.

Science in diplomacy is, today more important than ever for:

• Contributing to resolving the most pressing challenges of globalization, such as climate change, food security, pandemics, natural disasters, nuclear proliferation and cyber-security etc.
• Achieving long-term sustainable development, in keeping with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda.
• Promoting collaboration and harmony in international relations since scientific cooperation can serve as a communication channel when diplomatic relations is inactive.

Geographically, Pakistan is one of the most imperative states but, we could not get its maximum geopolitical benefit. Pakistan needs not only to revitalize bilateral and multilateral relations with neighbors and regional countries but also, world-over for peace, progress and prosperity of our people and also to play the decisive role in the region according to current regional and global scenario. As Pakistan’s new government has formed, now there is a need to revive foreign policy beyond traditional way to achieve our national objective with the mutual consent of all stakeholders, which must be in Pakistan’s best interest and that will benefit the people on the top. Government should make strenuous efforts for getting regional cooperation for peace, progress and mutual development; enhance strong diplomatic relations with primary focus on neighbors by resolving all disputes with regional countries. Unless region is peaceful, our efforts for growth and development will not be succeeded. In this regard, the Government of Pakistan (GoP) and foreign policy planners must utilize science in diplomacy as a new dimension for foreign policy of Pakistan and perform the following roles:

https://www.diplomacypakistan.com/articles/science-in-diplomacy-a-new-dimension-for-foreign-policy-of-pakistan/

• Devise the S&T based foreign policy and clear position to science and technology diplomacy (STD) as the new axis. Produce policy papers on subject arising in SciDip, science based foreign policy and strengthen diplomatic proficiency.
• Utilize S&T personnel in diplomatic activities/missions and scientific knowledge in formulating and implementing diplomatic policy and highlight the connection between science and socioeconomic development.
• Develop and implement policies that will strengthen Pakistan science and engineering through international cooperation and monitor S&T development abroad to understand the S&T strategies of other nations for diplomatic agendas and regional groupings.
• Set a diplomatic agenda based on scientific evidence and advice, and lead international efforts and proactively convey the message that Pakistan will take leadership role for the solution of global challenges by using S&T to achieve desirable international circumstances.
• Continue its efforts to strengthen good governance, with emphasis on merit based institutional development and the rule of law, and exceptionally eliminate corruption and nepotism from society as-a-whole.
• 
  

Poverty Alleviation In China: Can Pakistan Learn Lessons From Poverty Alleviation Strategies?

“In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.” – Confucius

It is extensively acknowledged that poverty, inequality and growth are strongly intertwined and form a complex set of triangular relations. Among the most significant is the identification that growth can contribute to poverty reduction but only if the reimbursement of the growth can reach everyone in society. Exclusively, in the case of absolute poverty, it means only if growth can help those living below some nationally or internationally specified poverty line of income escape from such poverty, and embark on some self-sustaining process of self-development and self-realization.

Since the mid-1980s China has developed an extensive officialdom committed to poverty alleviation. The State Council authorized the Leading Group for the Economic Development of Poor Areas (LGEDPA) as the top anti-poverty decision-making body leading to synchronize anti-poverty programs at ministerial levels. During the last three decades, the achievements of China against poverty have fascinated the concentration of social scientists, economists, and international organizations to draw some lessons for developing countries to fight against poverty in their own settings. Over the last 30 years, China has undergone a profound economic transformation and lifted hundreds of millions of people from poverty. This process has reshaped the global economy and changed the economic perception for nations and people all around the world.

On 16^th October 2016, President Xi Jinping announced on China Central Television (CCTV) that he would eliminate poverty in China by 2020. Determinately, China has became the first middle income country to achieve the first Sustainable Development Goal of eradicate poverty with many pioneering and effectual practices in targeted poverty alleviation. In the course of realizing the “Two Centenary Goals” and the Chinese Dream of revitalizing the nation, it is paying attention on safeguarding and civilizing people’s well-being, proliferating all social programs, and caring people’s rights to equal participation and development.

At the 2017 China Poverty Reduction International Forum in Beijing, the Chinese government launched the Global Poverty Reduction Online Knowledge Sharing Database. China’s Internet-based poverty alleviation technique has set an archetype for the rest of the world. As China continues to take a more vigorous role in poverty alleviation on the global stage, it is an ideal position to be a close collaborator with other developing countries and share the lessons it has learned from its own poverty reduction experience. The Chinese Government has been pushing forward its “Internet Plus” strategy in poverty reduction efforts. It has accelerated the government’s poverty reduction efforts in rural areas. According to China’s Ministry of Commerce, more than 150,000 poverty-stricken families joined the e-business sector in 2016-17 and the government is planning to take e-business to more than 80% of villages by 2020.

• China’s Poverty Eradication Achievements:

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with poverty reduction as its primary goal, demonstrated the confidence and determination of the international community in jointly eradicating poverty and achieving common development. As the world’s largest developing country, China has always attached great importance to poverty alleviation and development.

• Over 700 million people reduced poverty according to China’s national poverty line.
• The rural poverty-stricken population was reduced to 30.46 million by the end of 2017, with the poverty incidence dropping to 3.1%.
• According to the 1.9 dollar poverty line, China lifted 850 million people out of poverty, with the percentage of people living in extreme poverty falling from 88% to 1.85%.
• China has contributed to over 70% of the poverty reduced across the world, making itself a country with the most people lifted out of poverty in the world.
• Providing 120,000 opportunities and 150,000 scholarships for citizens of developing countries to receive training and education in China.
• Increasing investment in the developing countries to 12 billion dollars by 2030. Setting up the Assistance Fund for South-South Cooperation with an initial pledge of 2 billion dollar to support developing countries in implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

[International Poverty Reduction Center in China (IPRCC)]

The nitty-gritty of Chinese success, in poverty reduction, are rooted in its firm political willpower and commanding organizational capability, which ensured macroeconomic stability and successful poverty alleviation policies at the macro level, and empowered the poor at the micro level. As Pakistan’s new government has formed, now there is a need to revive pro-poor policies beyond traditional ways to achieve objectives which must be in Pakistan’s best interest and that will benefit the poor people of the country. In Pakistan welfare plans will get a tremendous boost if it can learn lessons from China’s experiences and achievements in poverty alleviation through the Poor Rural Communities Development Project, the Southwest Poverty Reduction Project, the Qinba Mountains Poverty Reduction Project, the Gansu and Inner Mongolia Poverty Reduction Project, the Guangxi Rural Poverty Alleviation Pilot Project etc. It is important to note here, policies and programs have also been launched in Pakistan by previous governments, but they have not brought any real change in poverty, mainly due to poor governance and weak institutions, policy gaps, poor implementation and corruption, low public spending and nepotism, population pressure and internal conflicts.

In a nut shell, China’s best practice and successful experience in poverty reduction should be a “Role Model” for Pakistan where almost 75% of the poor are clustered around the poverty line. According to the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reform report, 39% of Pakistanis living in multidimensional poverty and 20% slightly above the poverty line. With a truly astonishing reputation, China is irrefutably a world-leader in poverty reduction and there is a lot the rest of the world can learn from its experience, including Pakistan.

http://www.diplomacypakistan.com/articles/poverty-alleviation-in-china-can-pakistan-learn-lessons-from-poverty-alleviation-strategies/

Free, Fair & Transparent Election Without Technology???

“Elections matter, but how much they matter depends entirely on how free, open and fair they are” – Elliott Abrams

With the evolution in science and technology in today’s e-society, modern information and communication systems that have resulted only do not offer easiness for people to find information, but also provides opportunity for people to articulate their wills. The exponential growth of information and communication technologies (ICTs), especially the internet has been useful and yielded positive impact. Numerous studies have witnessed these positive impacts, for instant, in healthcare, e-government and public administrations, education etc.In developed countries ICT have been valuable to the e-societies with e-services. ICTs have brought about a completely innovative and healthier government (e-government) that is seen to be more open to the needs and aspirations of society, more democratic, and more proficient. One key aspect of e-government is the enhancement of e-democracy that engages citizens to support the democratic decision-making processes and strengthen representative democracy through the use of ICTs tool. In particular, the application of ICTs on electoral processes in most developed countries, mainly, electronic voting (e-voting) have been remarkable.In Pakistan, e-democracy and ICT applications in electoral process is at infancy phase where emphasis is gear towards providing public information and services, promoting citizen participation, building trust between government and citizens. Though, much has not been done to guard the integrity of elections i.e. voter registration and voting process but in the last general election perspective, some ICT tools were used in registration verification process via SMS, relevant tools were not effectively employed during voter registration and voting. Furthermore, with the current electoral system in country, it is difficult, if not impossible to track down election frauds, implying that one voter, one registration or one vote is not guaranteed. Consequently, election frauds such as multiple registration, multiple voting, figure falsification and impersonation are not exception, though remains unobserved. Nevertheless, it is believe that when electoral system of this kind exit, the trustworthiness and the integrity of the elections can be threatened or lead to failures and corruption of democracy.

Since, ICTs have turned out to be a significant part of modern society, the term “electronic voting” has become widespread. The term “e-voting” refers to the integration of information and communication technology at one or more stages of the electoral process. It is generally used to describe any type of voting that involves electronic means. However, there are some differences in the definition of electronic voting in terms of the inclusion of the electronic apparatus in the recording of the vote – front-end of the election, or in the counting process – back-end.But, it is fact that when appropriate ICT tools (e-voting) are taken in electoral processes, it can go a long way to rid fraudulent elections practices and uphold its integrity.Electronic voting systems are characterized by the fact that they integrate ICT into the system, which establish many advantages in electoral process in the following ways:

• One of the most potential benefits is the increase in speed of the ballot tabulation process. As the votes are stored digitally and the counting procedure is mechanical, the waiting time for the result is reduced considerably.
• The increase in accuracy of the results is another advantage, but it depends on the kind of system used and design and conditions of the hardware and software, as well as human behavior.
• One key issue that has to be highlighted is the cost associated with electronic voting. The first investment that the government has to make is the purchase of hardware and software, which involves high costs. But it brings economics of scale as the increase of the size of the electoral roll does not increase the cost linearly. It also brings savings in the future elections as the hardware and software are reusable and because the ballots no longer have to be printed, but can now be shown on a computer or terminal screen.
• Accessibility is another added value for electronic voting systems, as it allows alternative ways to access the ballots. It decreases rates of abstention, especially when the remote voting method allows widespread technologies to be used, such as cell phones (for SMS voting) or the internet. The fact that voters do not have to move physically to a vote centre to cast their vote provides geographic independence and better accessibility for people with disabilities, increasing electoral participation.
• Given that the ballots are design through computer systems, multiple languages options can be provided on the ballot. If the system is user-friendly it will also offer more information about each candidate to help the voters in their selection.
• Electronic voting system can help prevent common errors as under-voting (voting for less than the allowed number of candidates) or over-voting (voting for more than the allowed number of candidates).

Today’s e-society obtaining benefits from ICT in various aspects of life ranging from getting ordinary public services to supporting everyday work. The impact of ICTs on elections has been valuable dramatically. It can be used to enhance the democratic process – engage citizens or build trust with the government. Trust building with ICT can also be extended to election process to promote its transparency. Pakistan’s electoral system needs honesty and clearness in its election process and the transparency and trustworthiness of any electoral system is what characterized it to be free and fair which in turn, is one of the foundation stone of democracy. The fact is that, in any democratic society, free and fair election is linked to having a generally acceptable result that goes with organizing and conducting elections in an unbiased and fair manner, devoid of frauds or malpractices. This is because trust and confidence in democracy is only promoted when the electoral system process is transparent and open to all electoral stakeholders. As a nation, we must stand-up and prepare for our will to prevail through a trustworthy and credible electoral exercise along with transfer of power to the true representative not just to the national or provincial assemblies but, to the Union Council level. These are the concerns need observations in the Pakistan’s electoral process and e-voting is solution for free, fair & transparent election.

http://www.diplomacypakistan.com/articles/free-fair-transparent-election-without-technology/